![]() Also, make sure you know whether or not there is a fee for the iPad app or for the syncing services. Another feature to look for, which I don't find useful, but lots of people seem to, is syncing with iPad. I discuss data storage and options in part 4. You could also use Spotlight, built into your Mac OS if you target the folder. I think that several of these applications will do it, but I use a separate application for doing that, which I think has better search algorithms. There is one important feature that I have not tested on all reference managers: the ability to search the contents of attachments. Reference management software is developing in a direction that I don't think is that necessary: PDF annotation, which I have yet to find an implementation that I prefer to a regular PDF reader, but there could be some exceptions. author suppression, "see also" prefix or suffix), collaboration, and ability to work well with writing software in a way that does not interrupt my train of thought. What I look for in a reference manager is ease of use, ability to customise templates for output styles, stability, modification of in-text citations (i.e. Wikipedia keeps an open entry on reference managers that might be of interest to you. Here, I get a bit more specific about requirements useful to social science researchers. Again, I am a Mac user, so other experiences and options might be better suited for users of other operating systems. I will take a look at several reference managers that I have tried out and let you know some of my reflections on them. ![]() This section follows Part 1 on writing tools. I think they have to be chosen together and compatibility among them has to be considered before deciding on both. The latest builds are always available online on the software's download page and can be accessed as either a ZIP file or through the Bazaar repository using EclipseĪvailable for all major desktop operating systems: Windows, Linux and Mac OS Xįree online backup of complex user settings so hours of work are never lostįree add-on for integration with Microsoft Office WordĬons: Other similar software, such as Zotero and Mendeley, are suited for different things that might be better for the user's purposes.Reference managers have to play nice with your writing tools. Pros: Completely free and open source, which means that anyone can fork and modify the code to their own needs. Docear also comes equipped with a unique document recommendation system that will automatically suggest new literature based upon what's already stored in the software's database, making additional research on a subject easier than ever. For example, within Docear, one can utilize reference management, PDF management and mind mapping without having to open more application on the machine. Thanks to the software's "literature suite" design, multiple tools are combined in a single application. Once a user gets the hang of Docear, it's possible to view multiple annotations of many documents at the same time. Even the annotations on these documents can be sorted easily. Papers can be sorted into various categories with the click of a button. This comprehensive software features an easy-to-use single-part user interface for organizing any sort of scholarly research documents. Overall Opinion: While not many people have to deal with loads upon loads of academic research papers, those who are given the task are often faced with tedious organizational work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |